Creativity of the Solution and Approach

Innovative Ideas

(0-15%)

• Solution and approach already exist on the market and not new (A)
• Solution and approach do not have an improvement orientation or the improvement orientation is not clear (L)
• Solution and approach have not considered the ability to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I).

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution and approach have a new perspective, but the difference compared to other solutions currently on the market is still unclear (A)
• Solution and approach do not have an improvement orientation or are unclear about the improvement orientation (L)
• Solution and approach have considered the ability to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution and approach are new and partly solve the problem consistently in accordance with the stated function (A)
• Solution and approach with a general improvement orientation (L)
• Solution and approach are compatible in solving the problem with value chain approach in the industry and field (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution and approach are new and creative, with systematic assessment questions about suitability for the environment, operations, effectiveness and system, according to the topic in a consistent manner (A)
• Solution and approach have evaluation and improvement processes based on practical lessons and innovation applied to all functions (L)
• Solution and approach are effectively integrated with current and future needs in solving problems with value chain pproaches in the industry and field (I)

Prospect Solutions

(0-15%)

• Solution and approach are already available on the market and not consistently addressing the problem (A)
• Solution and approach have not implemented any activities that meet the requirements of the topic (D)
• Solution and approach do not have an improvement orientation or are unclear about the improvement orientation (L)
• Solution and approach have not considered solving problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution and approach start solving problems following the topic in a consistent manner (A)
• Solution and approach have been implemented in most of the functions required by the problem, but have not been significantly effective (D)
• Solution and approach do not have an improvement orientation or are unclear about the improvement orientation (L)
• Solution and approach have been considered to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Effective and systematic solution and approach with assessment questions about the suitable business environment, operations, effectiveness and systematicity of the solution according to the topic in a consistent manner (A)
• Solution and approach are implemented in different functions in different stages required by the problem with good results (D)
• Solution and approach have a systematic measurement for improvements towards operational efficiency through cycles of improvement, knowledge sharing, and innovation between functions as required by the problem (L)
• Solution and approach are compatible with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Effective solution and approach, with systematic assessment questions about the suitable business environment, operations, effectiveness and systematicity of the solution according to the topic in a consistent manner (A)
• Solution and approach are well and fully implemented in different functions as required by the problem, without weaknesses or gaps in the functions (D)
• Solution and approach have a process for evaluation and measurement towards improvements based on practical lessons, innovation applied to all functions, with sharing and analyzing on organizational-level (L)
• Solution and approach are well integrated with current and future needs with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

Criteria will be evaluated based on the perspective of Process and Results. In there:

“Process” refers to the innovative method the solution uses and improves. The process is evaluated based on four interconnected factors, expressed as the development process of the solution:

• Approach – (A)
• Deployment ( D)
• Learning and Improvement (L)
• Integration – (I)

“Results” refers to the outputs and impacts of the solution when applied. Four factors are used to evaluate results:

• Levels (Le)
• Development Trends (T)
• Comparisons with the market (Comparisons – C)
• Integration (I)

Readiness for the Vietnamese market

Innovative Ideas

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have a systematic approach to Customers/Infrastructure/Legal/Human Resources suitable for the business environment and operations (A)
• Solution does not have an improvement orientation or the improvement orientation is not clear about Customers/Infrastructure/Legal/Human resources (L)
• Solution and approach have not considered the ability to solve problems with value chain approaches  in the industry and field (I).

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution initially having a direction and approach in a systematic way to Customers /Infrastructure/Legal/ Human resource policies suitable for the business environment and operations (A)
• Solution is oriented towards general improvement on Customer/Infrastructure/Legal/Human resources (L)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has an effective approach with system of questions about the operating environment, efficiency and systematic assessment of (Customers/infrastructure/Legal/Human resource policies (A)
• Solution initially have a measurement and evaluation process aimed at improving efficiency in the aspects of Customer/Infrastructure/Legal/Human resources (L) 
• Solution and approach have solved a number of problems with value chain approaches in industries and fields (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has an effective approach and a good system of questions about environment, operations, efficiency and systematic assessment of Customers/infrastructure/Legal/Human resources  (A)
• Solution and approach have evaluation, measurement and improvement processes based on practical lessons, innovation applied to all functions, with sharing and analysis of lessons (L ).
• Solution and approach are effectively integrated with current and future needs in solving problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

Prospect Solutions

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have an effective and systematic approach to Customers/Infrastructure/Legal/Human resources suitable for the business environment (A) 
• Solution has not yet implemented any activities and has not been applied consistently in its approach to Customers/Legal/Infrastructure /Resources (D)
• Solution does not have an improvement orientation or is unclear about the improvement orientation regarding Customers/Infrastructure/Legal/Human Resources  (L)
• Solution and approach have not considered solving problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution start to have an effective and systematic approach to Customer /Infrastructure /Legal/Human resource policies suitable for business environment (A)
• Solution has implemented initial activities in the aspects of Customer/Infrastructure/Legal/Human resource policies, but limited effectiveness (D) 
• Solution has a general improvement orientation in the aspects of Customer /Infrastructure/Legal/Human resources (L)
• Solution and approach have begun to consider solutions with value chain approach in the industry and field (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has an effective approach with a system of questions about the operating environment, efficiency and systematicity about Customers/infrastructure/Legal (A)
• Solution and approach have been implemented in different functions with different stages of the solution as required by problem with  good results (D) 
• Solution has a measurement, evaluation and improvement process to improve operational efficiency in the aspects of Customer/Infrastructure/Legal/Human Resources based on practical lessons (L)
• Solution and approach are compatible with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has a very effective approach based on a system of questions that completely meets the business environment, efficiency and systematicity of (Customers/infrastructure/Legal/) Human resources  (A)
• Solution has been fully implemented and applied with good results for the aspects of Customer /Infrastructure/Legal/Human Resource Policy, with no weaknesses and significant gaps between these aspects (D)
• Solution and approach has a process for evaluation and measurement towards improvements based on practical lessons, innovation applied to all functions, and sharing and analyzing on organizational-level  (L)
• Solution and approach are well integrated with current and future needs with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

Criteria will be evaluated based on the perspective of Process and Results. In there:

“Process” refers to the innovative method the solution uses and improves. The process is evaluated based on four interconnected factors, expressed as the development process of the solution:

• Approach – (A)
• Deployment ( D)
• Learning and Improvement (L)
• Integration – (I)

“Results” refers to the outputs and impacts of the solution when applied. Four factors are used to evaluate results:

• Levels (Le)
• Development Trends (T)
• Comparisons with the market (Comparisons – C)
• Integration (I)

Reasonable cost to expand the market

Innovative Ideas

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have a resource plan suitable for the business/operational environment, in an effective and systematic way (A)
• Solution does not have an improvement orientation or the improvement orientation is not clear in terms of resource planning (L)
• Solution does not consider balancing resources to solve the problem with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution starts to have a resource plan suitable for the business/operational environment, in an effective and systematic manner (A)
• Solution is oriented towards general improvement in the use of resource planning. (L)
• Solution has a balanced Resource plan to solve the problem with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has an effective approach with system of questions about the operating environment, efficiency and systematic assessment of (Customers/infrastructure/Legal/Human resource policies (A)
• Solution initially have a measurement and evaluation process aimed at improving efficiency in the aspects of Customer/Infrastructure/Legal/Human resources (L) 
• Solution and approach have solved a number of problems with value chain approaches in industries and fields (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has an effective and adequate resource plan to completely meet the assessment questions  suitable for the business/operational environment (A)
• Solution has a systematic process of evaluating, measuring and improving the use of resources based on practical lessons, analyzing and evaluating, and screening resource implementation plans, (L)
• Solution has a resource plan that is compatible with the current and future needs for value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

Prospect Solutions

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have an effective and systematic resources plan suitable for business environment and activities (A)
• Solution has not been implemented or has very few implementation activities, and resource plan has not been consistently applied (D)
• Solution does not have an improvement orientation or is unclear about the improvement orientation in terms of resource planning (L)
• Solution does not consider a balance resource plan to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution starts to have an effective and systematic plan for resources suitable for business environment  and activities (A)
• Solution and approach has initially implemented activities according to the resource plan but the results are still limited (D)
• Solution is oriented towards general improvement in  resource planning (L)
• Solution has a balanced resource plan to solve the problem with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has an effective and systematic resource plan, suitable for the business environment and activities (A)
• Solution has started implementing activities according to the resource plan, with good results in the early stages (D)
• Solution has an initial measurement and evaluation system aimed at improving the use of resources (L)
• Solution has resource planning compatible with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has a very effective and systematic resource plan, completely meeting the assessment questions that suitable for business environment and activities (A)
• Solution has fully implement activities according to the resource plan, without significant weaknesses and gaps (D)
• Solution has a systematic process of evaluation and improvement for the use of resources based on practical lessons, with analytic, evaluation, and screening resource  plans (L)
• Solution has a resource planning compatible with current and future needs with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

Criteria will be evaluated based on the perspective of Process and Results. In there:

“Process” refers to the innovative method the solution uses and improves. The process is evaluated based on four interconnected factors, expressed as the development process of the solution:

• Approach – (A)
• Deployment ( D)
• Learning and Improvement (L)
• Integration – (I)

“Results” refers to the outputs and impacts of the solution when applied. Four factors are used to evaluate results:

• Levels (Le)
• Development Trends (T)
• Comparisons with the market (Comparisons – C)
• Integration (I)

Ability to scale up

Innovative Ideas

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have information, analytical data, strategic goals and specific plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition suitable with business environment and business activities ( A)
• Solution does not demonstrate an improvement orientation or the improvement orientation is not clear in evaluating information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition  (L)
• Solution doesn’t have analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution starts to have with information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition suitable for business/operational environment (A)
• Solution is oriented towards general improvement in evaluating information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition (L )
• Solution has analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has an  effective and systematic approach on information, analytical data, strategic goals and plan on market access, processes, and competition suitable for business/ operational environment (A) 
• Solution has a clear improvement orientation in terms of evaluating information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition ( L)
• Solution has analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has an effective method and a system of questions that fully meet the evaluation of information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition suitable for the business/operational environment (A)
• Solution has a systematic process of evaluating and improving information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition towards operational efficiency (L)
• Solution is compatible with the present and future in terms of analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

Prospect Solutions

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans effectively and systematically on market access, processes, and competition suitable with the business environment and activities (A)
• Solution has not yet implemented any activities to collect information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition (D)
• Solution does not have an improvement orientation or is unclear about the improvement orientation in evaluating information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on markets access, processes, and competition (L)
• Solution does not have analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition to solve problems with value chain approaches in Industry and field (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution starts to have an effective and systematic information, analytical data, strategic goals and  plans on market access, processes, and competition that are suitable for the business environment and activities (A)
• Solution has implemented activities to evaluate information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition, but with limited effectiveness (D)
• Solution is oriented towards general improvement in evaluating information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition (L)
• Solution has analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has an effective and systematic way to evaluate information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, customers, processes, and competition suitable with business environment and  activities (A)
• Solution has implemented activities to evaluate information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition, with results at the early stage (D)
• Solution has an initial system of measuring and evaluating information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition towards operational efficiency (L)
• Solution has analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has a very effective assessment method and a system of questions that fully meets the assessment of information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, competition suitable with business environment and activities (A)
• Solution has fully implemented assessment activities and there are no weaknesses or gaps in assessment information on analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, competition (D)
• Solution has a systematic process of evaluation and improvement on information, analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition towards operational efficiency suitable with business situation, including improvements in assessment information and management tools (L)
• Solution has analytical data, strategic goals and plans on market access, processes, and competition compatible with the present and the future needs to solve problems with value chain approaches in the industry and field (I)

Criteria will be evaluated based on the perspective of Process and Results. In there:

“Process” refers to the innovative method the solution uses and improves. The process is evaluated based on four interconnected factors, expressed as the development process of the solution:

• Approach – (A)
• Deployment ( D)
• Learning and Improvement (L)
• Integration – (I)

“Results” refers to the outputs and impacts of the solution when applied. Four factors are used to evaluate results:

• Levels (Le)
• Development Trends (T)
• Comparisons with the market (Comparisons – C)
• Integration (I)

Thoroughness in Problem Solving

Innovative Ideas

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have reports on the expected results from solving the problem (Le)
• Comparative information about competitors, markets, processes and customers is not reported or not provided in a detailed and specific manner (C)
• Information about some important areas in the solution’s goals is not reported, especially related to value chain approaches (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution has several reports on the expected results that meet the basic questions about the market, customers, impact (Le)
• Little comparative information about competitors, markets, processes, customers (C)
• Have reports on a number of important areas in the solution’s goals, especially related to value chain approaches (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution have reports on expected results from the solution at a fair level, meeting basic questions about the market, customers, and impact (Le)
• Has comparative information about competitors, markets, processes, and customers at a feasible level (C)
• Solution has reports on many important areas in the solution’s goals, especially related to value chain approaches (I).

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has reports on expected results from a good to excellent level that addresses multiple overarching questions related to performance, market, customers, impact (Le)
• Have comparative information about competitors, markets, processes, and customers at a good level, showing trends favorable to the solution (C)
• Solution has  expected results for most aspects of the process, market, and main customers, demonstrating relevance to value chain approaches (I)

Prospect Solutions

(0-15%)

• Solution has no reports on the market, customers, impact from the solution (Le)
• Solution has no reported data on the rate of performance improvement (financial performance, impact performance..) or if there is mainly shows an adverse trend (T)
• Solution has no report on comparative information about competitors, markets, processes (C)
• Solution has no reported information on any important areas in the solution’s goals, especially related to value chain approaches (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution has a performance report that answers basic questions about the market, customers, and impact of the solution (Le)
• Solution has some data reports the rate of performance improvement (financial performance, impact performance..), some data still shows unfavorable trends (T)
• Solution has a comparative information about competitors, markets, processes, and customers at a feasible level (C)
• Solution has reporting information on many important areas in the solution’s goals, especially related to value chain approaches (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has a performance report that meets the overall question of effectiveness, market, customers, impact from the solution (Le)
• Solution with beneficial trends are clearly shown in important areas (market, customers, processes, competition) (T)
• Solution performance (financial performance, impact, etc.) are evaluated as relatively well level when compared to competitors, markets (benchmarks), processes, customers (C)
• Solution performance results are reported in most aspects of processes, markets, key customers with value chain approaches (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has an excellent performance report that addresses all questions related to effectiveness, market, customer, impact from the solution (Le)
• Solution with beneficial trends are maintained over time in most important areas (market, customers, processes, competition) for the goals of the Solution (T)
• Solution with Benchmark scores are shown in many areas (financial efficiency, impact efficiency, market, customers…) (C)
• Solution with forecasts and performance results reported in most aspects of processes, markets, customers, action plans with value chain approaches (I)

Criteria will be evaluated based on the perspective of Process and Results. In there:

“Process” refers to the innovative method the solution uses and improves. The process is evaluated based on four interconnected factors, expressed as the development process of the solution:

• Approach – (A)
• Deployment ( D)
• Learning and Improvement (L)
• Integration – (I)

“Results” refers to the outputs and impacts of the solution when applied. Four factors are used to evaluate results:

• Levels (Le)
• Development Trends (T)
• Comparisons with the market (Comparisons – C)
• Integration (I)

Sustainability of the solution

Innovative Ideas

(0-15%)

• Solution has no report on sustainability and expected impact from solving the problem (Le) 
• There is no data reported on the sustainability and impact of the solution, or if there is, it mainly reflects adverse trends (T)
• Comparative information about the sustainability and impact of the solution in aspects of competition, market, process, customers is not reported or not provided in a detailed and specific manner (C)
• There is no information reporting expected results on important areas of sustainability in the solution’s objectives, especially related to value chain approaches (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution has several reports of expected results that answer the basic question of sustainability, impact (Le)
• There is some data reporting on the sustainability and  impact of the solution, some data still shows adverse trends (T)
• Little comparative information on the sustainability and impact of the solution in the aspects of competitors, markets, processes, and customers (C)
• There is information reporting expected results on many important areas of sustainability and impact in the solution’s objectives, especially related to value chain approaches (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution has a report that addresses a wide range of questions about sustainability and impact (Le)
• Some data reports on the sustainability and impact of the solution, most data shows a beneficial trend (T)
• Comparative information about the sustainability and impact of the solution in the aspects of competitors, markets, processes, and customers at a feasible level (C)
• There is information reporting expected results on many important areas of sustainability and impact in the solution’s objectives, especially related to value chain approaches (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution reports expected levels of performance that address the overall question of sustainability and impact (Le)
• Beneficial trends are clearly shown in the data that are important to the goal of the Solution (T)
• Some levels of sustainability and impact have been evaluated relatively well in the aspects of competitors, markets (benchmarks), processes, customers, (C)
• Solution has expected results for most aspects of sustainability and impact, demonstrating special relevance with value chain approaches ( I)

Prospect Solutions

(0-15%)

• Solution does not have a report on the sustainability and impact of the solution (Le)
• Solution has no data on its sustainability and impact, or if there is shows mainly adverse trends (T)
• Solution has no  comparative information on sustainability and impact of the solution in aspects of competition, market, process (C)
• Solution has no reported information on important areas in terms of sustainability and main impacts in the solution’s goals with value chain approaches ( I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Solution has several outcome reports that answer basic questions about sustainability and impact (Le)
• Solution has data on its sustainability and impact, some of which still shows adverse trends (T)
• Solution has little comparative information about the sustainability and impact of the solution in terms of competitors, markets, processes, and customers (C)
• Solution has reporting information on important areas in terms of sustainability and main impacts in the solution’s goals with value chain approaches (I )

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Solution reports performance that meets the overall question of sustainability and impact (Le)
• Solution with beneficial trends are clearly shown in the data that are important to the goal of the Solution (T)
• Solution performance on sustainability and impact are evaluated as relatively well when compared to competitors, markets (benchmarks), processes, customers (C)
• Solution’s performance results are reported in most aspect of sustainability and main impacts with value chain approaches (I

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Solution has a excellence performance report that addresses all questions related to sustainability and impact (Le)
• Solution with beneficial trends are maintained over time in most important areas related to sustainability and impact for the goals of the Solution (T)
• Solution with good Benchmarks are shown in many areas of sustainability and impact (C)
• Solution has forecasts and performance results reported for most sustainability aspects and main impacts with value chain approaches (I)

Criteria will be evaluated based on the perspective of Process and Results. In there:

“Process” refers to the innovative method the solution uses and improves. The process is evaluated based on four interconnected factors, expressed as the development process of the solution:

• Approach – (A)
• Deployment ( D)
• Learning and Improvement (L)
• Integration – (I)

“Results” refers to the outputs and impacts of the solution when applied. Four factors are used to evaluate results:

• Levels (Le)
• Development Trends (T)
• Comparisons with the market (Comparisons – C)
• Integration (I)

NĂNG LỰC ĐỘI NGŨ

Innovative Ideas

(0-15%)

• Competency profile does not clearly demonstrate the expertise and skills of Individual/Management Team/Operating/Implementation, especially in areas related to proposed solutions (A)
• Competency profile does not clearly demonstrate implementation experiences, especially in areas related to the proposed solutions (D)
  Competency profile does not clearly demonstrate improvements and learning processes for the problem raised in the solution (L)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Competency profile demonstrating the expertises and skills of Individual/Management Team/Operating/Implementation, especially in areas related to the proposed solutions (main competencies are priority) (A)
• Competency profile demonstrating implementation experiences and key competencies related to the proposed solutions (D)
  Competency profile has presented some improvement and lessons learned for the problem raised in the solution (L)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Competency profile has demonstrated the expertises and skills of Individual/Management Team/Operating/Implementation related to the proposed solutions, with a description of core competencies appropriate to the solution (A).
• Competency profile has demonstrated the approach based on implementation experiences related to the proposed solutions (D)
• Competency profile presents assessment systems, improvements and lessons for the problems raised in the solution (L)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Competency profile  has proven expertise and skills of Individual/Management Team/Operating/Implementation fully meets the effective and systematic approach (A)
• Competency profile has demonstrated a good problem-solving approach, with no significant gaps and weaknesses among functional groups in the proposed solution (D)
• Competency profile presents process-based assessment systems that allow improvements from practical lessons consistent with the problems raised in the  solution (L)

Prospect Solutions

(0-15%)

• Competency profile has not proven that the Management/Administration/Implementation team has expertises suitable for the proposed solution (A)
• Competency profile does not demonstrate implementation experience related to the proposed solution (D)
• Competency profile does not present improvements and lessons learned for the problems raised in the solution (L)
• Competency profile does not highlight the interconnectedness of competencies within the team members (I)

(20%, 30%, or 40%)

• Competency profile has somewhat proven Management/Administration/Implementation teams have expertise suitable for the proposed solutions (main competencies are priories).(A)
• Competency profile demonstrates implementation experience related to proposed solutions and is consistent with the topic, with a number of key competencies (D)
• Competency profile has presented improvements to the problem raised in the solution with a number of key competencies (L)
• Competency profile highlights the interconnectedness of the competencies of team members in coordination, especially with key groups of functions to solve problems (I)

(50%, 60%, or 70%)

• Competency profile has proven that the Management/Administration/Implementation team has an effective and systematic approach in the professional organizational structure suitable for the proposed solutions ( A)
• Competency profile demonstrates a good problem-solving approach, there may be differences between groups of functions in the proposed solution (D)
• Competency profile presents process-based assessment systems that allow improvements from practical lessons consistent with the problems raised in the solution (L)
• Competency profile highlights interconnectedness of competencies which compatible with the needs and capacities of relevant parties as required by the topic (I)

(80%, 90%, or 100%)

• Competency profile has proven that the Management/Administration/Implementation team fully meets the effective and systematic approach on the organizational structure suitable for environment, operations, and effectiveness (A)
• Competency profile demonstrates a good problem-solving approach, with no significant gaps and weaknesses among groups of functions in the proposed solution (D)
• Competency profile presents process-based assessment systems that allow improvements based on practical lessons suitable for the problems raised in the  solutions, including lessons and some innovations in key management tools and are shared at the organizational level (L)
• Competency profile shows the good interconnectedness of competencies and is compatible with the needs and capacities of relevant parties as required by the topic (I)

Criteria will be evaluated based on the perspective of Process and Results. In there:

“Process” refers to the innovative method the solution uses and improves. The process is evaluated based on four interconnected factors, expressed as the development process of the solution:

• Approach – (A)
• Deployment ( D)
• Learning and Improvement (L)
• Integration – (I)

“Results” refers to the outputs and impacts of the solution when applied. Four factors are used to evaluate results:

• Levels (Le)
• Development Trends (T)
• Comparisons with the market (Comparisons – C)
• Integration (I)